Blog
Thursday, 22 October 2009 10:39

In a previous post, Vako Tamaklo discussed business schools’ tarnished image, in light of their alleged role in training and proliferating a managerial class whose unbounded avarice and sometimes-questionable practices helped steer the global economy to the brink of collapse.  (Conspicuous example: Steven Rattner’s account of management at GM.)  Leaving aside the question of the degree to which business school educations merely reflect the nature of the prevailing business culture versus actively shaping it, this much is certain: the recession has proved good business for business schools.

While many companies -forced to slash expenses across the board- have been cutting back on b-school provided training, applicants to MBA programs have spiked as workers hope to wait out today’s economic doldrums while gaining skills for a fatter paycheck tomorrow.  For those without the luxury of attending a full-time business school, online MBAs offer flexibility and low prices.  A recent article in The Economist details the increasing specialization and variety of offerings found at business schools, including Bordeaux University’s Executive Wine MBA.   With so many business education choices, and so few job opportunities, many aspiring CEOs have found the allure of the MBA irresistible.

Corporations, too, have been wooed by schools through customized programs offering mid-crisis revitalization, as John Slack of the Association of Business Schools explained to CNN.  As b-schools successfully maintain and even expand the scale of their operations, one can’t help but wonder if the lessons of the current economic meltdown have been thoroughly absorbed at the grooming centers of tomorrow’s business leadership.  Let’s hope that we all don’t have to learn the hard way, again.

Add a comment
 
Written by John Mullins and Randy Komisar Wednesday, 14 October 2009 09:24

If the founders of Google, Starbucks, or PayPal had stuck to their original business plans, we’d likely never have heard of them. Instead, they made radical changes to their initial models, became household names, and delivered huge returns for their founders and investors. How did they get from their Plan A to a business model that worked?  Why did they succeed when most new ventures crash and burn?

Let’s face an uncomfortable fact: the typical startup process, largely driven by poorly conceived business plans based on untested assumptions, is seriously flawed. Most new ventures, even those with venture capital backing, share one common characteristic. They fail. But there is a better way to launch new ideas—without wasting years of your time and loads of investors’ money. This better way is about discovering a business model that really works: a Plan B which grows out of the original idea, builds on it, and once it’s in place, enables the business to grow rapidly and prosper.  
 

Getting to Plan B in Your Business 

How can you break through to a business model that will work for your business? First, you’ll need an idea to pursue.  The best ideas resolve somebody’s pain, some customer problem you’ve identified for which you have a solution that might work.  Google, for example, makes hard-to-find information instantlyaltaccessible. Alternatively, some good ideas take something in customers’ lives that’s pretty boring – think old-fashioned coffee shops, many of them now gone, supplanted by Starbucks – and create something so superior it provides true customer delight.   

Next, you’ll need to identify some analogs, portions of which you can be borrow or adapt to help you understand the economics and various other facets of your proposed business and its business model. You’ll need antilogs, too. Analogs and antilogs don’t have to only be from your own industry, though.  Sometimes the most valuable insights come from unusual sources, as was the case for Steve Jobs in turning Apple from an innovative but struggling PC-maker into a music industry phenomenon. Jobs copied ideas from Sony’s Walkman, Napster’s free but illegal downloads, and more.   

Having identified both analogs and antilogs, you can quickly reach conclusions about some things that are known about your venture.  But it is not what you know that will likely scupper your Plan A – it’s what you don’t know.  The questions you cannot answer from historical precedent lead to your leaps of faith – beliefs you hold about the answers to your questions despite having no real evidence that these beliefs are actually true.  

To address your leaps of faith, you’ll have to leap!  Identify your leaps of faith early and devise ways to test hypotheses that will prove or refute them. By doing so, you are in a position to learn whether or not your Plan A will work before you waste too much time and money. 

But what do you actually need to consider when developing your business model?  Every model needs to quantitatively address five key elements:

  • Revenue Model: Who will buy?  How often? How soon?  At what cost?  How much money will you receive each time a customer buys?  How often will they send you another check?
  • Gross Margin Model:  How much of your revenue will be left after you have paid the direct costs of what you have sold?
  • Operating Model:  Other than the cost of the goods or services you have sold, what else must you spend money on to keep the lights on?
  • Working Capital Model:  How early can you encourage your customers to pay?  Do you have to tie up money in lots of inventory waiting for customers to buy?  Can you pay your suppliers later, after the customer has paid?
  • Investment Model:  How much cash must you spend up front before enough customers give you enough business to cover your costs?
 

Uncovering the right analogs and antilogs, identifying your most important leaps of faith, and testing a series of hypotheses to inform all five elements of your business model doesn’t happen in a single ”eureka” moment. Getting to a viable Plan B is a journey that can take numerous iterations over months, perhaps years. For PayPal, what eventually worked was founder Max Levchin’s Plan G!  

To guide this process, we suggest you build a dashboard – a systematic record that will focus your attention on the critical issues and more efficiently deploy your precious time and resources to removing the critical risks.  It provides a way to respond to the real-life data you generate and make mid-course corrections when your data so indicates.   
 

The Cold, Hard Facts 

Most business plans assume that most everything is already known up front – not the case, as the PayPal example shows.  As the famed American general in World War II, Douglas MacArthur, is reputed to have said, “No plan ever survives its first encounter with the enemy.”

The process articulated here is a healthy alternative to the straight-jacket of today’s business planning practices – to enable you to anticipate and move beyond a failing Plan A. It is a process designed for learning and discovering, rather than for pitching and selling.  It’s a process that recognizes the cold, hard facts – most often, what ultimately works, is not the Plan A that was so persuasively articulated in the original plan.  Instead, it’s Plan B.  
 

JOHN MULLINS is an Associate Professor of Management Practice and holds the David and Elaine Potter Foundation Term Chair in Marketing and Entrepreneurship at London Business School.  RANDY KOMISAR is a Partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers in California.  Their new book, “Getting to Plan B: Breaking Through to a Better Business Model,” was recently published by Harvard Business Press.

 

Interested in the book? Check out the review from FinancialTimes.com.

 

Add a comment
 
Monday, 05 October 2009 13:39
Why did most professional economists – and especially academic economists – fail to predict the financial meltdown ? Wearing my hats of former chief economist for World Bank’s Latin American Region, and later for the International Finance Corporation, I was delighted to read Harold Meyerson’s article (below). He argues, rightly in my experience, that most economists are trapped in a fantasy universe, in which the laws of supply and demand ensure that bad things not only won’t happen, but cannot ever happen. I used to have a bumper sticker on my car in the 1970s: THE REAL WORLD IS A SPECIAL CASE. Even back then, academic economists were gaining credentials by dint of mathematical “models” they built, which were drifting toward a Cloud-Cookoo Land of total disconnect from real-world problems. Luckily for me, I am ungifted in maths and spent my time working with emerging markets' governments at trying to solve practical problems, and this saved me from irrelevancy.

A point similar to Myerson’s was made years ago by Professor David Colander, in a book felicitously entitled “Why Aren’t Economists As Important As Garbagemen? Essays on the State of Economics”.

Are Colander and Myerson right? I am looking forward to your views.


Article text

Add a comment
 
Thursday, 01 October 2009 10:57
A previous GBSN blog entry entitled 'Can Business Schools Rebuild Their Image' referred to a 2008 article from the Harvard Business Review that grapples with the knowing-doing gap faced by business schools. In light of the findings that many high-level managers of major companies, that were severely distressed during the peak of the financial crisis, were also graduates of business schools, critics, and some employees of  b-schools, have suggested that management education has become too theoretical, lacking the real-world application methods to help managers to effectively solve problems. Although many professors champion the case-study method as a solution to this practice problem, there remains a question that lies at the source: What level of practical experience is sufficient, as provided by b-schools?

Perhaps the answer might be found in a selected paper from the Graduate School of Business of the University of Chicago entitled 'Rethinking Management Education: A View from Chicago.' The paper constructs a model of the necessary elements needed to provide effective performance as a manager. The primary elements are conceptual and domain knowledge, and the combination of these lead to action skills which in turn produce action and then outcomes. The advanced form of this model figures in insight skills that come into play at the outcome stage, and feedback into action skills. According to the model, there are three players: business schools, companies and students. Each has a comparative advantage in a particular element: whereas business schools are more apt to creating conceptual knowledge, companies have a comparative advantage in producing domain knowledge; it is the responsibility of the student to harness their mental capacities to develop insight and action skills. The paper concludes with a recommendation that these three players work together to ensure effective outcomes in the marketplace.

Thus, is it possible that b-schools are doing all that they can do to develop effective managers and are placing emphasis in the right area. Or is the knowing-doing gap, the theory/practice dichotomy still one to be argued?

Add a comment
 
Thursday, 01 October 2009 09:57
Among the wonders of modern information and communications technology is the ability of information and ideas to spread extraordinarily rapidly and often with complete disregard to the interests -and pocketbooks- of its would-be owners.  This constant tendency towards free circulation has of course created an overwhelming plethora of information, in which a seeker of diamonds may spend long hours wading through cyber-rough.

Luckily for those pursuing of top-notch business ideas and education, our friends at Online College Reviews have compiled an excellent list of business-related lectures, interviews, and the like, featuring business leaders, innovators, and academics from preeminent schools and companies.  Topics range from eco-friendly drywall to the future of the Web to the life and times of Cornelius Vanderbilt, and are categorized by topic to give users easy access to their area of interest.  For those with an interest in business, economics, and technology, this collection represents a virtual gold mine of important ideas powered by original, intelligent thinking.

http://www.online-college-reviews.com/index.php/100-free-lectures-for-a-cutting-edge-business-education/

Add a comment
 
«StartPrev212223242526272829NextEnd»

Page 26 of 29
Register Now!

Food for Thought

“The global crisis is not just a problem with mortgage systems and the regulation of banks in one country with a domino effect into many others. It also forces universities and business schools to ask questions about the nature of business and management education, and the issues of ethics we incorporate.”

Max Price, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cape Town